Comparison
It depends. These telescopes serve fundamentally different purposes despite nearly identical overall scores. The single most important differentiator is portability. The Explore Scientific ED102 FCD100 weighs just 3.18kg, making it genuinely transportable for field observing, while the Celestron Advanced VX 6" SCT at 34.2kg demands a vehicle and significant setup effort. This weight difference cascades into practical observing frequency. The Celestron Advanced VX 6" SCT excels for planetary observation and astrophotography from a fixed location.
Its 1500mm focal length delivers higher magnification for lunar and planetary detail, and the equatorial mount with tracking provides the stable platform astrophotography demands. However, its poor deep sky score and portability rating suggest it struggles with extended objects and casual observing. The Explore Scientific ED102 FCD100 trades planetary performance for versatility. Its ED optics minimize chromatic aberration, the f/7 ratio suits wide-field deep sky work, and exceptional portability means you will actually use it regularly. The modest 8/100 planetary score reflects inherent refractor limitations, not poor quality.
Buy the Celestron Advanced VX 6" SCT if you plan fixed-location astrophotography and planetary study. Buy the Explore Scientific ED102 FCD100 if you want a portable telescope you will use frequently for general observing. The ED102 offers better value through versatility and usability.
Why choose Celestron Advanced VX
Why choose Explore Scientific ED102