Comparison
The Celestron EdgeHD 800 OTA is the clear winner for most amateur astronomers. Its 8-inch aperture delivers substantially more light-gathering power and resolving capability than the ED127's 5-inch mirror, translating to superior performance across nearly every discipline. The single most important differentiator is aperture. The EdgeHD 800's 203mm opening versus the ED127's 127mm represents a 60% increase in light-gathering ability.
This advantage compounds across planetary observation, deep-sky viewing, and astrophotography, where the EdgeHD 800 scores 69, 59, and 66 respectively compared to the ED127's 42, 39, and 46. The EdgeHD 800's built-in GoTo system also streamlines target acquisition, while the ED127 requires separate mounting solutions. The ED127 FCD100 suits budget-conscious observers prioritizing portability in a compact refractor design, though its modest performance scores limit its appeal. The Celestron EdgeHD 800 OTA is the better investment for anyone serious about observing planets, clusters, galaxies, or pursuing astrophotography.
For most amateur astronomers, invest in the Celestron EdgeHD 800 OTA and experience the dramatic difference aperture makes. The ED127 appeals only if portability constraints force a compromise on optical performance.
Why choose Celestron EdgeHD 800
Why choose Explore Scientific ED127