Comparison
The Celestron EdgeHD 800 OTA is the clear winner for most amateur astronomers, scoring 81 overall versus the NexStar 6SE's 73. The single most important differentiator is aperture; the EdgeHD 800's 203mm objective versus the 6SE's 150mm translates to significantly superior light-gathering, contrast, and detail across all observing domains. This larger aperture gives you roughly 82 percent more light collection, a meaningful advantage for planetary viewing, deep sky observation, and astrophotography.
The NexStar 6SE remains a viable choice if portability is your primary constraint. Its fork mount design is lighter and more compact for transport, though paradoxically heavier at 19kg due to its integrated base. The EdgeHD 800 OTA is a tube-only design requiring separate mounting, but serious observers typically invest in quality equatorial mounts anyway.
The Celestron EdgeHD 800 OTA suits observers prioritizing optical performance and who can accommodate a dedicated mount and setup location. The Celestron NexStar 6SE appeals to those needing self-contained goto functionality with genuine portability concerns. For most amateur astronomers with reasonable space and budget, the EdgeHD 800's superior optical capability and scoring across all performance categories make it the better investment despite higher cost.
Why choose Celestron EdgeHD 800
Why choose Celestron NexStar 6SE