Comparison
The Celestron AstroMaster 130EQ-MD is the clear winner for most amateur astronomers. While both telescopes cost nearly identical amounts, the AstroMaster's 130mm aperture provides significantly more light-gathering power than the FirstLight's 114mm, translating directly to brighter, more detailed views of deep sky objects. The single most important differentiator is aperture size.
The AstroMaster's extra 16mm of aperture gives it a meaningful advantage across nearly every observing category, particularly deep sky observation where its 54/100 score substantially exceeds the FirstLight's 44/100. The AstroMaster's equatorial mount with motorized tracking also provides superior planetary viewing and astrophotography capabilities, scoring 50 and 68 respectively compared to the FirstLight's weaker 39 and 38. The FirstLight's only real advantage is its f/4.3 focal ratio, which provides a slightly wider field of view, but this marginal benefit does not offset its overall optical limitations.
Buy the Celestron AstroMaster 130EQ-MD if you want serious deep sky performance and can manage a slightly heavier telescope. Purchase the Explore Scientific FirstLight 114mm only if portability is your absolute priority or budget constraints force you to choose the marginally cheaper option. We recommend the AstroMaster for most observers seeking genuine astronomical capability at this price point.
Why choose Celestron AstroMaster 130EQ-MD
Why choose Explore Scientific FirstLight