Comparison
It depends on your priorities. The Celestron 114LCM wins for beginners with its GoTo system and superior beginner score of 61 versus 41, making it far easier to locate objects. The 150EQ dominates astrophotography with a commanding 71 score compared to 53, thanks to its fast f/4.3 focal ratio and equatorial mount. The single most important differentiator is the mount type; the Celestron's computerized alt-az system requires no learning curve, while the 150EQ's equatorial mount and manual operation demand more experience but enable serious long-exposure imaging.
Choose the Celestron 114LCM if you're new to astronomy and want automated object finding without heavy lifting. Choose the 150EQ if you're committed to astrophotography or already comfortable with equatorial mounts, accepting its 13.5kg weight and steeper learning curve. For first-time casual observers seeking simplicity and affordability, the Celestron 114LCM is the safer choice.
However, the 150EQ's larger aperture and astrophoto capability offer better long-term value if you're willing to invest time learning proper equatorial mount operation.
Why choose Celestron 114LCM
Why choose Telescope, 150EQ Newtonian